Comparison of Decision-Making Styles in Typical Adolescents and Adolescents with Risky Behaviors
Keywords:
decision, making styles, adolescence, risky behaviorsAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to examine differences in decision-making styles between these two groups and to analyze their multidimensional decision-making patterns.
Materials and Methods: This applied study employed a causal–comparative and cross-sectional design. The statistical population consisted of adolescents aged 12 to 18 years residing in Tehran in 2025. Participants were selected using purposive sampling, and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 individuals were included in the study across two groups: typical adolescents and adolescents exhibiting risky behaviors. Data were collected using the General Decision-Making Styles Questionnaire developed by Scott & Bruce (GDMS). Data analysis was conducted using MANOVA, Welch ANOVA, and the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Findings: The results of multivariate tests indicated a significant difference in the overall pattern of decision-making styles between the two groups (Pillai’s Trace = 0.936, F ≈ 63.87, p < 0.001). Univariate analyses revealed that adolescents with risky behaviors scored higher on intuitive, dependent, and spontaneous decision-making styles, whereas typical adolescents scored higher on the rational decision-making style (χ² ranging from 17.89 to 20.77, p < 0.001). The avoidant decision-making style showed no significant difference between the two groups (χ² = 0.85, p = 0.357). Demographic analyses further indicated that risky behaviors were more prevalent among younger adolescents (12–14 years) and those in lower secondary education, while economic status, gender, parental education, and parental employment did not show significant differences.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that adolescents with risky behaviors exhibit a distinct pattern of decision-making styles, characterized by a dominance of intuitive, dependent, and spontaneous styles and a weaker rational style. This pattern may be associated with an increased likelihood of engagement in risky behaviors. These results highlight the importance of considering decision-making styles in clinical assessments and in the design of cognitive–behavioral and preventive interventions for at-risk adolescents.
Downloads
References
Al Nidany, E. S., Elnagar, M. A., El-Wahab, S. D., & Ebrahem, S. M. (2024). Relation between mental resilience and decision-making styles among secondary school students prone to substance abuse. Menoufia Nursing Journal, 9(3), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.21608/menj.2024.393911
Cooper, C., & Lhussier, M. (2026). Adolescent health: from individual risk behaviours to wellbeing ecosystems: learning from the paradigm shift. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 30(2), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2449844
Cosenza, M., Ciccarelli, M., & Nigro, G. (2019). Decision-making styles, negative affectivity, and cognitive distortions in adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(2), 517-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9790-y
Dhamala, E., Christensen, E., Hanson, J. L., Ricard, J. A., Arcaro, N., Bhola, S., & Yip, S. W. (2026). Neuroanatomy reflects individual variability in impulsivity in youth. Molecular Psychiatry, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03526-2
Dworak, E. M., Pila, S., Novack, M. A., Hosseinian, Z., Ho, E. H., Ece, B., & Weintraub, S. (2026). A scoping review of emotion and non-cognitive measures of decision-making ability in older adults by the ARMCADA study. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, 1718861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1718861
Hosseini, E., Esazadegan, A., & Soleymani, E. (2023). The mediating role of the varieties of inner speech in the relationship of decision-making and stress coping styles with suicidal ideation among high school students. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 29(3), 268-287. https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.29.3.4176.1
Huntley, A. P., Verdi, M., Conway, A. E., Sharma, H., Stukus, D., Nanda, A., & Herbert, L. (2024). Growing up with allergies: transitioning from adolescence to adulthood. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 132(5), 572-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.11.012
Icenogle, G., & Cauffman, E. (2021). Adolescent decision making: A decade in review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 1006-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12608
Kaveh, M. H., Zare, E., Ghahremani, L., Nazari, M., & Karimi, M. (2025). The Correlation between Resilience, Self-Control, Self-Regulation, and Decision-Making Style and Aggressive Behavior in Adolescents: An Analysis Using Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of School Health, 12(1).
Krishna, G. H. (2025). A Study on Risk-taking Behavior Among Adolescents in Selected Schools of Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala. Indian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 22(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.4103/iopn.iopn_8_25
Lewis, C. P., Klimes-Dougan, B., Croarkin, P. E., & Cullen, K. R. (2026). Understanding the emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescence from a brain and behavioral developmental perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology, 51(1), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02168-2
Mancone, S., Zanon, A., Marotta, G., Celia, G., & Diotaiuti, P. (2025). Temporal perspectives, sensation-seeking, and cognitive distortions as predictors of adolescent gambling behavior: a study in Italian high schools. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1602316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1602316
Miller, J. (2025). Decision Making Processes of Adolescent Women About Entering Intimate, Long-Term Romantic Relationships Walden University].
Páez Gallego, J., De-Juanas Oliva, Á., García-Castilla, F. J., & Muelas, Á. (2020). Relationship between basic human values and decision-making styles in adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(22), 8315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228315
Park, G., & Yang, Y. (2024). Sexual decision-making: an exploratory interview study of Cambodian adolescents. Frontiers in Reproductive Health, 6, 1409351. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1409351
Petlak, E. (2021). Typology of Adolescents in Terms of Risk Behavior-Differentiation in Terms of Parental Conditions. New Educational Review.
Rezaei, A., & Soltanifar, F. (2023). Family functioning and risky behaviors among female adolescents: mediating role of emotion dysregulation and decision-making styles. Current Psychology, 42(18), 15323-15335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02799-4
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and psychological measurement, 55(5), 818-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017
Sood, M., & Singh, D. C. (2021). Perceived Helicopter parenting and its relation with decision making styles and academic performance in the context of Indian adolescents. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11(5), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.11.05.2021.p11323
Wang, C., Song, X., & Tang, R. (2026). Age-related differences in short video influence on decision-making: The mediating role of executive functioning. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 42(7), 5287-5309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2544007
Wang, N., Liu, Y., Dang, R., Liu, S., & Shi, Y. (2026). The Impact of Parental Absence on Adolescents' Health Risk Behaviors: Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2026.2630740
Zeng, Z., Chen, Y., & Qu, W. (2026). The impact of subjective socioeconomic status and threat cues on intertemporal decision-making. Frontiers in psychology, 17, 1778247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1778247
Zhang, R., Zhang, C., & Huang, L. (2025). Emotional regulation self-efficacy and impulsivity effects on college students' risk-taking behavior: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in psychology, 16, 1566618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566618
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arman Salehi, Mehdi Aghaei Lomedasht, Emad Panjahi, Javad Jahedi (Author); Sahar Salehinia (Corresponding author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.